Core Requirement 2.12
The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan and demonstrates that the plan is
part of an ongoing planning and evaluation process. (Quality Enhancement Plan)
X Compliance Partial Compliance Non-Compliance
Narrative
The following narrative presents the topic selection, mission, and expected outcomes for the Quality Enhancement
Plan (QEP) for Nicholls State University.
QEP Topic Selection
During the summer of 2004, the University engaged in an exploratory survey of students, faculty, and staff to
identify general themes for the upcoming Quality Enhancement Plan
[1].
Over 80 percent of respondents to the
survey ranked the need for improving student engagement during the first-year experience as the number one theme.
Several factors contributed to this conclusion. In the fall of 2005, the University will increase its admissions
standards in accordance with the Louisiana Board of Regents' Master Plan, which will make the recruitment and
retention of first-year students an increasing priority. In preparation for the Master Plan, the University
prepared, with the assistance of a Noel-Levitz retention consultant, a Retention Plan. Submitted to the Board
of Regents in May 2003, it stressed the importance of early engagement of first-year students through both
classroom instruction and academic advising. In May 2004, a senior Noel-Levitz advising consultant prepared
an in-depth analysis of the University's academic advising program, placing special emphasis on the need for
frequent and intrusive advising of first-year students, and also detailing the mutually supportive roles that
effective teaching and advising can play with regard to improving student engagement and academic progression.
The newly developed QEP Team (with representation from faculty, students, K-12 education, and the business
community [2])
then facilitated focus groups with faculty and staff to more closely investigate the evolving
theme and to identify important student learning outcomes for the QEP. A content analysis of focus group
discussions helped the Team identify critical thinking and writing as important student learning outcomes
[3].
This consensus was particularly driven by assessment data. The University assesses student achievement in
general education areas through the nationally-normed ETS instrument Academic Profile (AP). Since 2002, 600
to 800 junior- and senior-level students at Nicholls have taken the test every fall and spring semester.
Over a three-year period, the AP results consistently demonstrate a weakness in critical thinking scoreson
average, only 3 percent of juniors and 4 percent of seniors reach the minimum level of proficiency in critical
thinking. In the writing area, Nicholls' students perform better, most reaching basic proficiency, but few
are able to reach AP's Level 3on average, only 8 percent of juniors and seniors reach this advanced level of
writing proficiency.
During the fall of 2004, the QEP Team met monthly to familiarize itself with ongoing institutional initiatives
and to discuss numerous issues related to the QEP.
During the spring of 2005, the QEP Team began to focus on identifying specific learning outcomes related to
critical thinking and writing. This undertaking coincided with the University's General Education Assessment
Committee's (GEAC) study and redesign of the general education curriculum. In a spirit of collaboration, the QEP Team
and the GEAC formulated goals, strategies, and outcomes related to critical thinking and writing for the QEP.
A QEP retreat was then held in the summer of 2005, which provided an opportunity for the QEP committee to share
its recommendations with the SACS steering committee, administrators, and students from across campus. As a
result of the retreat, a more focused QEP mission emerged with specific goals and strategies to foster a dynamic
relationship between student engagement and critical thinking, especially for first-year students.
QEP Mission
Because Nicholls, in keeping with its newly-adopted mission, strives to cultivate "productive, responsible,
engaged citizens in a personalized, culturally rich, and dynamic learning environment through quality teaching,"
the Quality Enhancement Plan will promote an institutional culture that enhances learning by engaging students
and faculty through critical inquiry. The mission of the Quality Enhancement Plan has evolved out of a commitment
to the University's previous and future strategic plans, mission, vision, and values, and through a broad-based
campus dialogue regarding our strengths and weaknesses. This reviewwhich included significant consideration of
recent University initiatives to enhance the first-year experience through the creation of a University Collegehas
aided our development of innovative learning and teaching opportunities that will promote greater student and
faculty engagement through inquiry-based strategies.
From this broad-based campus dialogue, goals and strategies were identified to improve both direct and indirect student
learning outcomes. First, students will become more academically engaged during their first year by taking advantage of
services offered through an improved Tutorial and Academic Enhancement Center and University 101 course. Initiatives will
encourage students to become more efficient learners by better understanding their individual learning strengths and weaknesses.
Less efficient learners will have opportunities to improve their learning processes and become more cognitively engaged.
Second, faculty engagement will improve through the use of a new faculty development center designed to promote greater
understanding of the teaching-learning process and to encourage the use of best teaching practices. Faculty engagement
will also increase through teaching enhancement grants and instructional ratings that provide best practice suggestions.
Finally, the creation of a critical inquiry learning community and faculty use of innovative teaching practices will promote
students' critical thinking and writing.
Expected Outcomes
As a result of these goals and strategies, Nicholls expects to increase instructors' use of best teaching practices
as well as improve students' use of efficient learning strategies, vocational preparation, critical thinking, and writing.
Achieving these learning outcomes will help Nicholls accomplish its mission to cultivate "productive, responsible, engaged
citizens in a personalized, culturally rich, and dynamic learning environment through quality teaching.'
|